🔗 Share this article

These times present a quite distinctive situation: the pioneering US march of the overseers. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all have the same objective – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even demolition, of the fragile truce. After the hostilities ended, there have been scant occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the territory. Only this past week included the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, a senator and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their roles.

Israel occupies their time. In just a few days it launched a set of strikes in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, as reported, in scores of Palestinian fatalities. Multiple officials demanded a renewal of the fighting, and the Knesset approved a initial measure to take over the occupied territories. The American response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in more than one sense, the American government appears more concentrated on upholding the current, tense period of the ceasefire than on advancing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding that, it appears the US may have aspirations but few tangible strategies.

For now, it is uncertain when the suggested international governing body will effectively begin operating, and the identical goes for the proposed security force – or even the makeup of its personnel. On a recent day, a US official declared the United States would not force the composition of the international force on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet continues to reject one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish suggestion this week – what occurs next? There is also the contrary point: which party will establish whether the troops supported by Israel are even willing in the task?

The issue of the duration it will require to demilitarize Hamas is similarly vague. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is intends to at this point take the lead in demilitarizing the organization,” remarked Vance recently. “It’s will require some time.” The former president further highlighted the lack of clarity, saying in an discussion on Sunday that there is no “fixed” deadline for the group to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unknown participants of this yet-to-be-formed global force could deploy to the territory while the organization's members continue to wield influence. Would they be facing a leadership or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the questions emerging. Others might ask what the verdict will be for ordinary Palestinians as things stand, with Hamas persisting to target its own political rivals and dissidents.

Latest incidents have yet again emphasized the blind spots of local reporting on both sides of the Gaza boundary. Each publication seeks to analyze each potential aspect of Hamas’s infractions of the peace. And, in general, the situation that Hamas has been delaying the repatriation of the bodies of deceased Israeli hostages has dominated the coverage.

Conversely, attention of civilian deaths in Gaza resulting from Israeli operations has garnered scant focus – if any. Consider the Israeli counter actions in the wake of a recent Rafah incident, in which two troops were killed. While Gaza’s officials stated dozens of fatalities, Israeli news pundits criticised the “moderate reaction,” which hit solely infrastructure.

This is nothing new. Over the past weekend, Gaza’s press agency charged Israel of breaking the ceasefire with Hamas 47 times after the truce began, resulting in the loss of 38 Palestinians and injuring an additional many more. The assertion seemed irrelevant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was merely ignored. Even accounts that eleven members of a Palestinian family were fatally shot by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s civil defence agency said the group had been seeking to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun district of the city when the transport they were in was attacked for supposedly crossing the “yellow line” that marks zones under Israeli army control. This boundary is invisible to the ordinary view and shows up just on plans and in government records – often not available to everyday individuals in the area.

Yet that incident hardly got a reference in Israeli media. Channel 13 News mentioned it shortly on its digital site, quoting an IDF representative who said that after a suspicious car was spotted, troops discharged alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle persisted to advance on the soldiers in a way that caused an immediate risk to them. The soldiers shot to remove the threat, in accordance with the ceasefire.” Zero fatalities were claimed.

Given this perspective, it is no surprise many Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to responsible for breaking the peace. That perception could lead to fuelling demands for a more aggressive strategy in the region.

At some point – perhaps sooner than expected – it will not be adequate for US envoys to take on the role of supervisors, instructing the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need